Assessment in SEPUP
SEPUP materials provide a research-based assessment system developed
in cooperation with the University of California Graduate School of Education.
The assessment system provides rubrics (called scoring guides). Student
responses to questions already embedded in the student material can
be scored using these scoring guides.
Teachers familiar with "holistic
scoring" will notice similarities between the use of rubrics and
the SEPUP scoring guides. The scoring guides have been developed so that
an individual scoring guide can be used for all of the assessments relating
to a particular skill throughout the entire course.
What do the scoring guides assess?
How do I use the scoring guides? (with video)
Can you show me an example?
How do I know when to score sudents?
How do I grade student answers?
Where can I find more web-based examples of SEPUP assessment?
What do the scoring guides assess?
There are several different scoring guides (similar to rubrics) that
can be used to assess students. Each scoring guide
focuses on a different skill. SEPUP has developed scoring guides to
assess
students on their
ability to:
-
design and conduct an investigation
-
analyze data
-
understand concepts
-
evaluate evidence and identify tradeoffs
-
communicate scientific information
-
work cooperatively in a group
^ top
How do I use the scoring guides?
There are five possible levels, from 0–4, on each scoring
guide. Each level indicates a quality
of response, as shown in the table below.
A score level of 4 is considered an
advanced response because it goes beyond being complete and correct in
some significant
way, such as providing
additional analysis or information.
Level on a
SEPUP scoring guide |
Student response |
4 |
Complete, correct, and beyond |
3 |
Complete and correct |
2 |
Partially correct and/or incomplete |
1 |
Incorrect |
0 |
Off task or not attempted |
To receive a particular score level, a response must fulfill
all the requirements of the lower levels in addition to the requirements
of the higher score. For example, even if only one aspect of a response
is incorrect or incomplete, a student should not receive a level
3 score. For most students, achieving consistent level 3 responses
would be an indicator of academic success. This is why the standards
for each level should be kept consistent. By maintaining the integrity
of scoring, teachers can help high-performing students (as well
as lower-achieving students) improve the quality of their work.
|
|
See
video of class
discussion on scoring a student paper.
You will need Quicktime
software to view this 6.3 MB clip.
|
^ top
Can you show me an example?
In the first few activities of Science
and Life Issues, students examine
scientific approaches to investigating
problems. In
Activity 2, "The
Pellagra Story," students
watch a video segment on the work
of Dr.
Joseph Goldberger, a scientist
of the early 1900s.
He was asked to investigate
the cause of pellagra, a disease
affecting thousands of people
in the U.S. His
investigations led him to conclude
that pellagra
was not an infectious
or genetic disease, but a nutritional
deficiency. The student book poses
the following question.
Compare the steps of the traditional
scientific method to the steps
Dr. Goldberger followed
to investigate pellagra. How
were the steps
the same?
How were the steps different?
This question is identified
as an assessment that can
be scored
using
the Understanding
Concepts scoring guide.
A
sample level
3 response
is provided below:
The traditional scientific
method begins by stating
a problem.
Dr. Goldberger was presented
with a
problem when
he was
asked to investigate
pellagra
and its causes. The next
step of the traditional scientific
method
is to
form a hypothesis.
Dr. Goldberger hypothesized
that an inadequate
diet was the cause of pellagra.
The next step is doing the
experiment, which
Dr. Goldberger did when
he fed the orphans a balanced
diet
and
cured
their pellagra.
In the traditional scientific
method, the next step
is recording and analyzing
data.
Dr. Goldberger
recorded and analyzed
data when he
examined the results
of his experiment. The
way in which Dr. Goldberger’s
work differed from the
traditional scientific method was that he
did not form a conclusion
immediately after his
first experiment with the orphans. Dr. Goldberger decided
to obtain more evidence
through experiments on prisoners. Only
then did he conclude that
his hypothesis was correct.
After reading this response,
you may feel that your
students are
not ready
to produce
such
a complete
response. Helping
students develop
the skills
to write this type of
a response is an overarching
purpose
of the SEPUP
assessment
system.
You may begin the school
year by
sharing
this "ideal" response
with students, and help
them revise their work
until it is at a level
3. Since they will continue
to be
assessed on these
types of questions,
they can continue to
build their skills over
the course of the
school year.
^ top
How do I know when to
score a student response?
Written responses
that are appropriate
for
scoring are identified
by
icons in the Teacher’s
Guide and contain
a complete and correct
sample response.
For example, an
Analysis Question
may be marked with
a small
box containing the
abbreviation "ET." This
indicates that this
question can be
assessed with the
Using Evidence to
Make Tradeoffs scoring
guide. In addition,
questions that can
be assessed are
usually identified
in the introductory
material of the
Teacher’s
Guide and in an
appendix on assessment.
Opportunities for
teachers to assess
student performance
(as
opposed
to written materials)
are identified
in the Teacher’s
Guide entry for
each activity,
as well as in
the introductory
material of the
Teacher’s
Guide.
^ top
How do I grade
student answers?
The scores that
students receive
using the
scoring guides
are not equivalent
to grades.
Most students
are not
likely to
achieve many
level 3 or
level 4 scores at
the beginning
of the
school year.
Teachers using
the
SEPUP assessment
system
have decided
on various
methods for translating
student performance
into grades.
One method
is to use
to students’ scores
over a grading
period to
create a
grading
scale. For
example,
the total
number of
assessed
assignments
may be ten.
If a student
received
a level
3 (complete
and correct)
on each
assignment,
the total
number of
points would
be 30. Early
in the
school year,
the majority
of students
may be receiving
a level
2 or lower.
A student
who received
a total
of 18 (perhaps
8 of 10
assignments
achieved
a score
level of
2) may be
assigned
a "B." The
number of
points required
to earn
a "B" may
change over
the school
year as
student
performance
improves.
Another
method
is to declare
in advance
that
students
earn a
certain number
of scores
at a particular
score
level to achieve
a certain
grade.
For example,
if
you plan
to assess
ten assignments
during
an early grading
period,
you
may require
students
to achieve
a
score
level
of 3 on at
least
five
of
the assignments
in order
to receive
an "A." This
number
should
change
as the
school
year progresses
and students
are expected
to produce
an increasing
proportion
of level
3 responses.
Some teachers
count
a score
more
than
once
if the assignment
is
considered
a more
important
assessment
than
previous assessments.
Other
teachers
translate
scores
into
their own point
system,
which
may
or may not
be based
on the
traditional
100
point system.
You
may
find yourself
experimenting
with
more than
one
approach until
you
find
the one that
works
best
for you and
your
student population.
^ top
Where can I find more web-based examples of SEPUP assessment?
You can find more examples of this and other assessment approaches at
Evidence
of Understanding: An Introduction to Assessments in K–12
Science Curricula, prepared by the Center for Science Education at Education
Development Center, Inc. (EDC). To
see how the SEPUP Assessment System evaluates student achievement:
^ top
|